Dublin Arts Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311101457
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dublin, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6148897444
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Council/Agency
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,382,371
- Expenses
- $1,282,582
- Assets
- $1,395,627
- Liabilities
- $80,762
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAYLN BARTLEY (PRESIDENT)
- EILEEN BOLTON (PRESIDENT-EL)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID GUION (EXECUTIVE DI): $155,355 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Engage the community, cultivate creativity and foster life-long learning through the arts.
What it reported doing in 2024
Art in public places - the dublin arts council art in public places program's goal is to enhance the quality of life for dublin's residents and to strengthen the city of dublin as a destination for visitors. The collection includes both large and small visual artworks acquired through a variety of models in which dublin arts council (dac) is actively engaged, including major gifting, committee-directed projects, calls for entries and jurying, on-loan programs with an acquisition component, interactive projects, contributions to the city's interior collection and projects which define a community initiative. Dac deepens engagement with the riverboxes, a geocaching inspired public art collection, and creates a number of initiatives to engage the community in creative pursuit. In 2017, the city of dublin contract mckay lodge art conservation to appraise the collection. The value of the collection was 3.8 million at that time. The dublin art in public places program began in 1988 and has grown to more than 70 large and small-scale permanent, temporary, and interactive public art projects today. Dublin arts council maintains that public art should inspire an emotional response, provoke questions, and invite interaction while encouraging ingenuity and creative discovery by artists. The collection of public artworks distinguishes our community and creates a sense of place while contributing to dublin's aesthetic legacy. In collaboration with the city of dublin, the dublin arts council adopted its first public art master plan in march 2021. In 2024, finalist presentations for the muirfield drive public art commission were held, which resulted in the selection committee unanimously recommending artist ivan depea and his proposal, s/wing. An agreement was signed by the artist and dublin city manager in 2024. Fabrication is underway for the project at the muirfield and whittingham drive location, with an anticipated completion and public dedication in early 2026. Beginning in june 2024, dac collaborated with the city of dublin to launch its "public art speaks" program, a series of one-day events that aimed to reintroduce the permanent public art collection. Selected artworks came to life through guest speakers, art-making and engaging activities that invited viewers to revisit, reconsider and reimagine public artwork in the collection. Featured works included watch house & circle mound at coffman park, going, going... Gone at daree fields and the simulation of george m. Karrer's workshop located in historic dublin. As part of this program, dac developed a digital public art map and a series of public art educational videos. Design work was also contracted for the creation of a printed version of the map which will be available in the fall of 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 86% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.5%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 67%; rating input score 67; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.5% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 26 of 26 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 28 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.