DTP Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934013736
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Branford, CT, USA
Phone
8606631190
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,960
Expenses
$370
Assets
$2,497

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Amy Valente (President)

People named in this filing

  • Robert D Boudreau (Treasurer)
  • Nicole Palffy-Muhoray (Secretary)
  • Ann Cowlin (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the DTP Institute, Inc. is to research, develop, implement, and support evidence-based culturally adaptive model programs that help girls and women develop dance-based body-trust and self-advocacy from puberty through post-menopause. It is the relationship among mental focus, imagery, movement, interoception, and expression that produces the valid sense of identity underlying body-trust and self-advocacy. Dance is the form of existence that has promoted this relationship for as long as humans have associated movement and gesture with meaning.

What it reported doing in 2024

The focus in 2023 and 2024 was to create the organization, find suitable volunteers to serve in a leadership capacity and develop a viable approach to begin fund raising efforts. The target to begin fund raising is the 2025 calendar year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.9%; rating input score 19
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 81.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.75; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -173.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -102.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 93.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 18.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $370 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.