Dtcf Partnership Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
825403661
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA
Rating
94
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$156,415
Expenses
$141,616
Assets
$157,096

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREW HARANT (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANDREW HARANT (PRESIDENT)
  • NICHOLAS PETERS (VICE PRESIDE)
  • AARON WHITE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A charitable community-based nonprofit organization dedicated to revitalizing and sustaining historic cuyahoga falls and its riverfront

What it reported doing in 2025

Downtown revitalization & community outreach: provided business promotion, community outreach, grant project support, marketing, sponsorship coordination, and administrative support activities necessary to carry out the organizations mission of enhancing the downtown area, supporting community partnerships, and attracting visitors, residents, and local investment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 46.2%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 29% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $142K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.