Drug Recovery Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 730968383
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4052301125
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,531,998
- Expenses
- $8,872,110
- Assets
- $11,253,757
- Liabilities
- $2,171,027
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jason Visor (President)
- Jed Boersma (Vice President)
- Edie Nayfa (CEO/Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Edie Nayfa (CEO/Executive Director): $531,033 total reported compensation
- Michael Fleetwood (COO): $508,735 total reported compensation
- Mary Jo Sullivan (Clinical Director): $134,902 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a comprehensive continuum of behavioral health services, grounded in evidence, responsive to personal need, and empowering personal change for those who have been affected by substance use or co-occurring disorders.
What it reported doing in 2024
Drug Recovery Inc. (the Organization) was incorporated in 1973 in the State of Oklahoma as a non-profit corporation with locations in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Enid, Oklahoma, and Lawton, Oklahoma. The Organization provides various residential and outpatient treatment programs for co-occurring and substance use and currently is doing business as Catalyst Behavioral Services.Services include:-Comprehensive Community Addiction Recovery Center (CCARC) certified by the Oklahoma Department and Mental Health and Substance Use.-Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF).-Outpatient and Intensive Outpatient adult co-occurring services which include psychiatric services, family therapy, medication assisted treatment, drug testing, case management and peer recovery support services.-Short term, outpatient based, medically directed and co-occurring disorder capable ambulatory detoxification services for adults.-Intensive Residential (37 treatment hours weekly), Residential (24 treatment hours weekly) -Residential for Co-Occurring Disorders (24 treatment hours weekly).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.4%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.7%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.4% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $531K · 9 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $246K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.