Drexel Preparatory Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271007082
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Whites Creek, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6157241670
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,898,347
- Expenses
- $3,024,458
- Assets
- $493,419
- Liabilities
- $376,231
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The overall goal is to develop the mind, body and spirit of citizens who are educated, caring, well-balanced, physically fit, service oriented individuals in a global society. Our Curriculum incorporates a "Service Learning" Model with an emphasis on, careers, Character education, and positive behavior.
What it reported doing in 2012
We served 267 students k-5 for teh school year ending june 30, 2013. The overall goal is to develop the mind, body and spirit of citizens who areeducated, caring, well-balanced, physically fit, service oriented individuals in a global society. Our curriculum incorporates a "service learning" model with an emphasis on, careers, character education, and positive behavior inculating students with a passsion for success in educaton and in lifebased on the premise that every student must be aforded the opportunity to reach his/her full potential in a safe nurturing, orderly environment conductive to learning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.76; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 144.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.