Dreavita
Legal name: Dreavita Counseling Coaching and Consulting Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933983399
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Altamonte Springs, FL, US
- Phone
- 813-690-5092
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $612,222
- Expenses
- $591,017
- Assets
- $10,577
- Liabilities
- $1,964
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Highest reported compensation
- Andrea Piazza (Founder): $90,424 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To increase access to innovative, evidence-based therapies and technologies, addressing significant gaps in mental health care, by prioritizing the well-being of clinicians to achieve the best patient outcomes and contribute to a better world.
What it reported doing in 2025
Dreavita provides accessible, evidence-based mental health care through a multi-state telehealth group practice. Services include individual and group psychotherapy, trauma-focused and perinatal care, and wellness and skill-based coaching, delivered by a team of licensed clinicians, associates, and coaches. The organization serves diverse and underserved populations across multiple states, accepting most major insurance plans to reduce financial barriers to care. In 2025, Dreavita significantly expanded its clinical team and service capacity to meet growing demand while maintaining a sustainable, practitioner-supportive employment model.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 12
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 104.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 107% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 49.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $532K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.