Dream Project Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
451869894
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
5712681083
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,095,234
Expenses
$1,074,560
Assets
$1,320,809
Liabilities
$254,853

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAREN VALLEJOS CORRALES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KAREN VALLEJOS CORRALES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $85,104 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The dream project empowers students from Virginia's immigrant community to succeed in college or vocational training through scholarships, mentoring, family engagement, and holistic support throughout their education.

What it reported doing in 2024

Scholar, and alumni support: dream project scholarship recipients received comprehensive support through activities and programming designed to foster success in college and careers: dream summit: the dream project hosts an annual, week-long dream summit for students focused on supporting student success in college and beyond. This year's summit focused on resilience and wellbeing. Coaching services: college can be a significant adjustment especially for first-generation students. In 2024-2025, the dream project partnered with beyond 12 to provide personalized college coaching services that helped students thrive academically and professionally. Coaching was offered to all first-year students, and students transferring from two-year to four-year institutions. Beginning in 2025-2026, these college coaching services have been brought in-house to further strengthen continuity of support and community connection. Mental health support: recognizing that emotional well-being is essential to academic and personal success, the dream project partners with the center for psychological services (cps) to cover the cost of eight individual telehealth counseling sessions for students. These confidential, professional services address challenges such as depression, anxiety, chronic stress, eating disorders, and other mental health concerns. Case management: as needed, the dream project's case manager connected students with internal and external community and government resources providing additional physical and mental health support services. Loans: the molly and joseph herman dream scholar loan fund, which provided interest-free loans to eligible students for unexpected emergencies and daca application fees. Students received loans up to $2,000 for undergraduate educational expenses, payable directly to educational institutions. Non-daca loans are repaid after graduation within two years, while daca loans are repaid in monthly installments over five months. Emergency relief fund: the emergency relief (erf) is a targeted financial resource designed to support dream project scholars experiencing temporary, critical external emergencies that pose a direct threat to their ability to complete a college or career and technical education (cte) degree. In light of current and anticipated risks, including political instability, immigration enforcement, and the threat of detention or deportation. The erf will focus exclusively on immigration-related legal emergencies that create a direct and immediate barrier to completing a college or cte program. Computer aid: a reliable computer is essential for college. The computer aid program either pays for the repairs or provides scholars with a refurbished computer. Sharing our stories: sharing our stories is a six-week workshop that creates a supportive space for reflection, connection, and healing through personal storytelling. Facilitated in small groups meeting weekly for 75 minutes, participants explore their challenges and strengths through poetry, art, and writing. The program fosters resilience, community, and a deep sense of belonging, allowing participants to share at their own pace. Solidarity circle: the solidarity circle is a monthly virtual gathering for dream project scholars and alumni, facilitated by belinda passafaro, case manager and senior consultant. This inclusive and confidential space offers tools and strategies for wellness, mindfulness, and mutual support. Participants are invited to reflect, connect, and grow together building a stronger, more supportive community. Legal consultation: the dream project understands that navigating the legal system can be complex and intimidating. The dream project is dedicated to providing its scholars with access to quality legal information and resources. As part of its efforts to achieve this goal, dream project offers one or more free consultations in the area of immigration law to answer questions or provide a second opinion with volunteer at

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 50% for direct work, and 50% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $923K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.