Dragonmount

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
924023241
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Elk Grove, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Camps

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,613
Expenses
$27,497
Assets
$27,813

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Katherine Campbell (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Katherine Campbell (CEO)
  • Jason Denzel (Director)
  • Amanda Keen (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dragonmount is a social community engaged in activities that celebrate a shared enjoyment of genre-based fiction books, television, and related media. Historically our focus has been on The Wheel of Time franchise but we've begun branching out to new topics. Dragonmount organizes virtual and in-person events, provides news and updates, and sells licensed products. Our revenue comes from merchandise profits and 3rd party sponsorships. All money earned is invested back into the business in order to maintain our infrastructure and to pay consultants, contractors, or other third-party vendors. By becoming an exempt organization, our social community can thrive and provide enjoyment and other benefits to our membership without the necessity of earning a profit or increasing value

What it reported doing in 2025

Website, Forums, Social Media, Newsletter

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.7%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -59.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.