Dr WF and Mada Dunaway Manor Nursing Home of Guymon Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731138853
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Guymon, OK, USA
- Phone
- 5803383186
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,228,834
- Expenses
- $416,390
- Assets
- $2,332,270
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- Lynette Helm (Board Chairman)
- Jane Skelton (Vice Chairman)
- Chelsea Collins (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are devoted to providing aid and support to our residents so they can attain the best possible quality of life and achieve their greatest potential for health, mobility, and independence.Vision: We affirm the sacredness of all human life and the dignity of every human being.We celebrate life and seek the simple pleasures of life that provide fulfillment and happiness.We recognize the importance of relationships by actively listening with both our hearts and our minds so that we may better understand the feelings, motivations, and experiences of our residents.We treasure the unique qualities of each individual as well as our common humanity.We cherish the resources that we have been blessed with and strive to make the best use of those resources.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the year, the organization was in the process of ceasing operations. The organization's final resident departed in September 29, 2023, and its last employee separated from service in October 31, 2023. Following the cessation of program activities and staffing, the organization sold its remaining depreciable assets on August 30, 2024. The proceeds and remaining debt associated were forgiven by the USDA. No program services were conducted during the remainder of the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 18
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 93
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5.7%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 43.9%; rating input score 44
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 87.1%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.6; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 5.7% of revenue deployed · 43.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $183K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.