Dr Susan Love Research Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770009065
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- West Hollywood, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3108280060
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $80,453
- Expenses
- $80,689
- Assets
- $302,302
- Liabilities
- $13,900
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- MERIBETH BRAND (CHAIRWOMEN)
- BRENT HAWKINS (SECRETARY)
- JAKI KACKERT (VICE CHAIRWOMEN)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the dr. Susan love research foundation is to achieve a future without breast cancer by engaging the public and scientific communities in innovative research.
What it reported doing in 2024
Dr. Susan love research foundation conducts and collaborates on state of the art research within the scientific community, setting the stage for future medical breakthroughs and the eradication of the disease. Current collaborative projects include the biome of the breast, mapping the anatomy of the breast ducts, mapping dcis, and low cost automated ultrasound for breast cancer detection and diagnosis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 84% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.75; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 88.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.