Dr Piper Center for Social Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
650788551
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Myers, FL, USA
Phone
2393225346
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,505,782
Expenses
$1,333,392
Assets
$1,005,591
Liabilities
$86,114

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TINA PARSONS (CEO)
  • AMY ADMIRE HEYSTEK (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTINE ISENHOUR (PRESIDENT TO)
  • REV DR RICKEY L ANDERSON JR (V PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MELISSA BONNER (EXECUTIVE DI): $51,736 total reported compensation
  • TINA PARSONS (CEO): $41,262 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enhance the social and economic well being of seniors aged 55 and older, the community children with special needs, and the community as a whole. The dr. Piper center provides mentoring and tutoring to special needs children and curriculum based activities that make a positive impact in their lives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Foster grandparent program: the foster grandparent program provides volunteer opportunities and community involvement to low-income seniors aged 55 plus. It serves at risk children through one on one mentoring and tutoring in schools, after school programs and summer programs. Nationally, the foster grandparent program started 60 years ago while the dr. Piper center has been the local sponsor of the program for 33 years. We have about 44 volunteers annually that serve more than 437 children in local programs. Foster grandparents must pass federal background checks and national sexual predator test. They also attend mandatory orientation and inservice meetings in order to be effective in the classrooms. Individuals are assigned to volunteer stations in schools, after school programs, head start or vpk programs whom have a signed memo of understanding with the dr. Piper center. The mou stipulate the volunteer station duties and responsibilities of the volunteers and stations. School districts sign the mou which enables an entire school district to participate. We currently have 67 volunteer stations in lee county. Once a volunteer is placed at a station, the coordinator or teacher completed a child care plan for each child mentored and tutored by a volunteer. The child care plan is discussed with the volunteer upon assignment. Volunteers work at a minimum of 15 hours per week with assigned children, and submit timesheets for approval. Before the end of the school year the volunteer coordinator completes an outcome report for each child served, a survey, and conducts a volunteer evaluation. After school programs provide an opportunity for children to enrich their academic learning and participate in cultural and recreational activities in a safe, supportive environment. These programs have well developed curriculum which is implemented by staff and volunteers. The foster grandparent program provides one on one attention to children in these programs that allow children to develop self confidence, boost self esteem, and reach their full potential. By the end of each school year, children mentored by these volunteers increase their scores in academic subjects, and are successfully promoted to the next grade. Mentored children show an improvement in social skills and behavior due to the attention each child receives from the volunteers. Children receive tutoring in reading, english, spelling, and math. Volunteers listen to children read, tell stories, and participate in word games, conduct word identification, and other activities assigned by instructors. Volunteers also provide homework help to students who may be struggling academically. Volunteers review classroom assignments and instructional materials, assist with school projects and completion of homework. These volunteers provide emotional support to students and help teach and reinforce appropriate classroom and peer behaviors. Volunteers participate in actvities as part of the program. These activities include: outdoor recreational play, develop interests and talents, develop positive character traits, including honesty, kindness, courage, and social-emotional intelligence. Volunteers play games, complete projects, tell stories, have talks, and encourage children to develope positive character traits. Children served gain the individual attention they may not otherwise receive; tutoring which helps them succeed in school, advice and life skills needed to lead productive adult lives, and the life changing opportunity to know the consistent love of a foster grandparent. The volunteers make neighborhoods stronger by helping children achieve their goals. Fiscal year 24-25 foster grandparent of sw Florida provided 48,495 hours of service, meeting with more than 437 special needs children in the local community. The following outcomes were met: 1-93% of children served by fgp were promoted to next grade level. 2-92% of fgp volunteers benefitted from the program with increased hea

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.2%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.2% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $52K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.