Downtown College Place Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
334827236
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
College Place, WA, USA
Phone
5412124183
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Economic Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,600
Expenses
$894
Assets
$34,706
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jim Fry (Board Member, Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Jim Fry (Board Member, Vice President)
  • David Lopez (Board Member, Treasurer)
  • Kirk Amick (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Downtown College Place Association is to create a dynamic, inclusive, and prosperous downtown that honors College Place's history while fostering new opportunities for businesses, residents, and visitors alike. We aim to preserve and celebrate the distinctive character of College Place's downtown and its rich history while embracing future growth - emphasizing small business development, wellness initiatives, a strong educational presence, and thoughtfully designed public spaces that encourage connection, commerce, and a sense of place.

What it reported doing in 2025

No specific program service expenses were incurred in 2025 as the organization's expenses were all related to startup related costs for state and federal filings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 90
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 97.5%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 38.82; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.