Down Syndrome Medical Interest Group-USA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454156472
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8003622546
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,248
- Expenses
- $103,121
- Assets
- $205,581
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NICOLE BAUMER MD MED (PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW MCCORMICK MD FAAP (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KATIE FRANK PHD OTRL (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NICOLE BAUMER MD MED (PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW MCCORMICK MD FAAP (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ELISE SANNAR MD (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dsmig-USA is a group of health professionals committed to promoting the optimal health care and wellness of individuals with down syndrome across the lifespan. This is accomplished through education at the annual symposium on the latest research and facilitating networking among health professionals caring for individuals with down syndrome. Additionally, dsmig-USA supports development of down syndrome clinics and identifies and disseminates best practices of care.
What it reported doing in 2025
The annual symposium included presentations fom speakers, poster sessions and workgroup meetings that all focus on health issues in down syndrome across the lifespan. The number of persons benefited extends beyond the number of registrants - 187. Conference materials are posted on website and available to others for continued impact.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 60% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.7%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 86.3%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.99; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.7% of revenue deployed · 86.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.