Down Syndrome Indiana Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800732286
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3179257617
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Developmentally Disabled Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$404,878
Expenses
$363,437
Assets
$917,140
Liabilities
$33,213

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TANYA KAMMERER (PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTEN NORWOOD (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MACY POHL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MACY POHL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $59,541 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We enhance the lives of individuals with down syndrome and their families. We advise, educate, encourage, connect, include, and advocate.

What it reported doing in 2025

New parent packets - down syndrome Indiana provides comprehensive parent packets that contain a wealth of information to parents that have a newborn with down syndrome or have just learned of the diagnosis before their child is born. These packets are distributed to the families upon request or through local hospitals. A spanish version of the new parent packet is also available! There were 126 new parent packets distributed in 2025.community support groups - down syndrome Indiana recognizes that there are varied interests among the down syndrome community. Examples include geographical considerations, cultural considerations, educational considerations, and age considerations. Down syndrome Indiana recognizes the benefits of a community group among these families. Community groups include: dsi cass area down syndrome ("cads"), dsi cuenta conmigo, dsi dads appreciating down syndrome ("dads"), dsi lafayette, dsi terre haute, dsi east central playgroup, dsi mom's night out, dsi self-advocates, dsi teens, dsi Delaware county/muncie area, dsi black family village, dsi babies and toddlers, dsi southside, and dsi westside.first call - first call volunteers make a difference in lives by serving as the first point of contact with a new family. A first call parent is trained in empathetic listening skills and is a new parent's first look at what life with a child with down syndrome is like.medical outreach - the goal is to build relationships of trust and respect between medical providers and the down syndrome community. Provide accurate and up-to-date information about down syndrome to medical providers.dsi pathways to learning - the dsi pathways to learning program provides direct services through the community and was developed to supplement traditional education in reading and math through direct instruction and materials for students with down syndrome or other developmental disabilities. This program includes programming, educational advocacy, parent workshops, and family sessions. Awareness presentations - down syndrome Indiana representatives spoke to 2,100 people in 2025 through down syndrome awareness presentations. We speak to k-12 students, college students, medical professionals, service providers, and corporate partners and organizations.during 2025, down syndrome Indiana was able to reach 3,107 parents and 1,600 individuals with down syndrome through their programming.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 78.1%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.52; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71% of revenue deployed · 78.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $284K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.