Down Home
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823635989
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Fargo, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7015321488
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $956,747
- Expenses
- $871,873
- Assets
- $855,126
- Liabilities
- $15,908
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENESSA FILLIPI (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECT)
Highest reported compensation
- JENESSA FILLIPI (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECT): $77,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Down home empowers lives and stabilizes those emerging from homelessness by furnishing homes, strengthening connections, and transforming communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Entering housing is an important step in the journey of emerging from homelessness, yet four walls are not enough to solve the problem. Down home (dh) helps end the cycle of homelessness by creating homes and a community where families and individuals find comfort, dignity, stability, and connection. In 2025, the dh team served 55 new families and individuals, a 34% increase from 2024, impacting 137 men, women, and children. This was made possible through the dedication of 552 volunteers and the generosity of 988 donors. Our commitment to operational excellence led to scaling our team to 7 full-time employees to meet the rising demand for our program operations. The impact of down home's work is reflected in the voices of whose whom we serve. In 2025, 100% of clients reported that down home provided their family with security, comfort, community connection, and relief from financial stressors. All our clients face significant financial challenges, with 100% living below the poverty threshold. Additionally, 90% have an annual income of less than $35,000, and 85% have experienced domestic violence, mental health struggles, and/or substance abuse as a past trauma or catalyst for homelessness. Our commitment extends beyond move-in day. During the first year after their home reveal and beyond, we maintain intentional communication and provide ongoing support to those welcomed into the down home family. These resources include partnerships that provide a year of free internet, birthday celebration packages, transportation support, and an annual christmas celebration. Down home remains dedicated to breaking the cycle of homelessness by ensuring that every person we serve finds not just a house, but a home and a community that supports their journey to stability and self-sufficiency.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.6%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 79.3%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.6% of revenue deployed · 79.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $692K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $77K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.