Douglasville Kennel Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262158531
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Winston, GA, USA
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Other Services - Specialty Animals

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,288
Expenses
$67,410
Assets
$82,620

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The objective of the douglasville kennel club inc is to advance the principles and practices in the breeding of pure-bred dogs and to promote and conduct licensed dog shows and sanctioned matches under the rules and regulations of the american kennel club. They promote social and recreational activities in connection with dog breeding and exhibition.the douglasville kennel club sponsors akc sanctioned dog shows. The club also contributes to natural disaster rescue funds and local animal shelters. The club also sponsors a student for the university of Georgia college of veterinary medicine scholarship awards program.the club has monthly meeting and invite public speakers to speak on matters such as breeding practices, dna practices, and responsible dog ownership.

What it reported doing in 2012

To advance the principles and practices in the breeding of pure-bred dogs and to promote and conduct licensed dog shows and sanctioned matches under the rules and reglations of the american kennel club. To promote social and recreational activities in connection with dog breeding and exhibition.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.3%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $67K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.