Douglass Youth Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742785959
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Kingsville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3615958194
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Centers, Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $115,088
- Expenses
- $28,881
- Assets
- $134,670
- Liabilities
- $10,307
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEANNETTE PRICE (PRESIDENT)
- LYDIA PETTIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANTWON CARSON (DIRECTOR)
- DEREK CONLEY (DIRECTOR)
- ROSARIO GARCES (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To connect positive after-school programs that provide opportunities to enhance students' academics, enrichment, and drug awareness. Delivers productive, goal-oriented educational programs and activities for children in kleberg county and the city of kingsville to keep them safe and drug-free.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program operates two days each week of school year to provide assistance to students with their reading, mathematics, vocabulary building and homework. Current pilot project targets grades 2-5 for closest school to its vicinity. Program emphasizes student collaboration and interaction; incorporates enrichment activities to close academic gaps while also providing opportunity for social skill and character building
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 14
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.5%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 25.9%; rating input score 26
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 74.9%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.66; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.5% of revenue deployed · 25.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.