Douglas County Task Force on Family Violence Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582565934
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Douglasville, GA, USA
Phone
6787151196
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,192,985
Expenses
$993,516
Assets
$768,742
Liabilities
$237,193

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGEL WHITE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANGEL WHITE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $105,308 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The douglas county task force on family violence is committed to eradicating domestic violence, sexual assault, rape, stalking, dating violence, sex trafficking, child abuse, child neglect, and child endangerment in douglas county, douglasville, and throughout our community. We provide help and refuge for victims of these crimes. We provide education and training for the community to help us all work together to heal our homes and neighborhoods.

What it reported doing in 2024

See schedule o the douglas county task force on family violence is committed to eradicating domestic violence, sexual assault, rape, stalking, dating violence, sex trafficking, child abuse, child neglect, and child endangerment in douglas county, douglasville, and throughout our community. We provide help and refuge for victims of these crimes. We provide education and training for the community to help us all work together to heal our homes and neighborhoods.the dctf is a non-profit community service and offers free victim services, including:24-hour support hotlineforensic interviewingtherapycase managementhospital accompanimentcourt accompanimentcriminal justice advocacycounselingassistance with social services applicationsassistance with child support applicationsforensic medical examinationssupport groups in english and spanishlegal advocacy for victimstemporary protective ordersassistance with restraining ordersstalking prevention ordersassistance with victim's compensation casescommunity education and outreach opportunitiesreferrals to related or necessary services

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $44.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.7%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.6%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 28.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $847K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $105K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.