Douglas County Parkinsons Support Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
334166275
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Gardnerville, NV, USA
Phone
7753922764
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,461
Expenses
$4,168
Assets
$26,293
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Anthony Crescimanno (President)

People named in this filing

  • Anthony Crescimanno (President)
  • Daniel Osborne (VP & Treasurer)
  • Diane Noble (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide support to Parkinson's people. We strive to provide support, education, & exercise sessions for people affected by Parkinson's Disease. We serve at no cost the local Parkinson's people with Parkinson's; support, exercise, education. The group numbers about 70 people.

What it reported doing in 2025

Physical Fitness: our Fit4Life is designed to provide specific exercises for Parkinson's people, exercise is the only way known to slow the progression of Parkinson's, an incurable disease. We are still in start up phase of this program. Also exercise helps to manage Parkinson's symptoms. Donated services: DCCC&SC a function of Nevada County, Nevada (government), provides donated services to DCPSG in the form of: Exercise rooms; Equipment; Storage space; and meeting rooms, presently at no charge. DCCC&SC also provides vetting of our contracted exercise trainers. About 30 people are served by this program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 13.7%; rating input score 14
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 86.3%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.31; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 13.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.