Douglas County Community Mental Health Center Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331012005
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Omaha, NE, USA
Phone
4024443474
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,759
Expenses
$4,234
Assets
$45,350
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ishwor Dhakal (President and Director of Nursing)
  • Marti Christensen (Vice President, Retired Director of Nursing)

People named in this filing

  • Ishwor Dhakal (President and Director of Nursing)
  • Marti Christensen (Vice President, Retired Director of Nursing)
  • Sherry Driver (Secretary and Administrator, CMHC)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Medication and hygiene supplies for approximately 345 patients. Patient transportation assistance including bus tickets throughout the Midwest, local cab fare for patients to doctor and hospital appointments, specialized medical equipment < $1,000 and pharmacy expenses.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide support for CMHC patients and medical staff by providing expense coverage for emergency or unforeseen circumstances for the patients like a bus ticket home or cab fare to appointments or to the pharmacy; to continue lines of communication between family, doctors and care givers, and payment subsidies for pharmacy medications. Also provides testing or additional education fees (up to $300) for Medical professionals involved with the care of our patients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -53.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.71; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -102.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.