Douglas County Community Emergency and Natural Disasterrecoverygroup

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842016154
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Waterloo, NE, USA
Phone
4026691019
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$20
Expenses
$52,268
Assets
$3,011
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cyndi Borden (President)

People named in this filing

  • Cyndi Borden (President)
  • Jim Tomanek (Treasurer)
  • Stephanie White (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the organization is to assist individual and families in Douglas County who, due to their adverse circumstances as a consequence of a community emergency or natural disaster, require assistance within the scope and function of the DCCENDR Group.

What it reported doing in 2022

Assisting those displaced due to flooding of the Missouri and Elkhorn Rivers during the spring of 2019 including the clean-up, repair and reconstruction of homes in the affected areas in Douglas County and storage of furniture and other items. The organization's work done in this past fiscal year was done in coordination with The Kings Garden, a non-pforit organization also working in the area. During that time DCCENDRG assisted with repair and maintenance work on 8 homes, until their funds were essentially depleted.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -261,240%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -90% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -66.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -74.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.