Doug Holliday Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263883920
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Lake Mary, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4072214386
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $140,891
- Expenses
- $148,018
- Assets
- $91,070
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Doug Holliday (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Robert Doug Holliday (President): $54,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Doug Holliday Ministries exists to ignite the Body of Christ with Great Commandment-Great Commission priorities by inspiring, instructing, and involving the next generation of missional leaders worldwide. Programs include: Inspiring: Speaking at conferences, camps, retreats, outreaches, and churches Instructing: Training leaders in youth ministry, church planting, and evangelism Involving: Creating opportunities for potential leaders to get hands on experience ministry.
What it reported doing in 2025
Inspiring: led ministry retreats for students and leaders, contributed to blogs andpodcasts encouraging students and leaders, spoke in churches to champion disciple-making and missions. Instructing: trained youth leaders through virtual and in person events across northamerica. This disciplemaking training is impacting thousands of leaders. Raised funds tosupport training programs in east africa & haiti. Contributed to multiple blogs andpodcasts for ministry leaders. Involving: participated in global mission work in canada, haiti, central asia, moldova, south africa, nigeria, south korea, philippines, and israel.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.3%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 55.3%; rating input score 55; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.3% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $134K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $54K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 55/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.