Dorcas Place Adult and Family Learning

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
050391754
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
Providence, RI, USA
Phone
4012738866
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,082,061
Expenses
$3,228,959
Assets
$2,804,850
Liabilities
$388,696

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To assist low-income adults in realizing their full potential through literacy, employment, advocacy and community involvement.

What it reported doing in 2011

Functional literacy - the overall goal of the education program at dorcas place is to increase the educational functioning levels of low-income adults in reading, writing, oral communication, english language, math, financial and computer literacy skills. The functional literacy program embeds civics education and workforce literacy throughout the curriculum in order to prepare students for their adult roles of worker, family member and citizen.during fy 2012, dorcas place offered three levels each of esol and abe, as well as a fast track ged class. Dorcas place offers classes during morning, afternoon and evening hours, and serves students ranging in ability from beginning readers to individuals pursuing their ged and/or transitioning to post-secondary education.comprehensive student assessments, casas (comprehensive adult student assessment system), are conducted during the admissions process to determine appropriate class placement and to assist students and staff in identifying realistic and achievable goals for each student's individualized education, career and family plan. These plans are monitored and updated as needed each trimester. Casas tests are also administered after the admissions process so that we can monitor and report student progress. Curriculum development this year concentrated on effective instructional strategies for increasing student achievement and persistence rates. The curriculum continues to emphasize integration of applied math, financial literacy, civics, writing and workforce skills competencies, including the core competencies identified by equipped for the future and national institute for literacy.during the year ending june 30, 2012, the organization's adult education and english language (esol) programs at the beginning, intermediate, and adult secondary levels together served over 1,000 individuals.dorcas place continues to serve adults at low literacy and language levels, with a significant number of students enrolling at or below the sixth grade reading level.the english language/civics education program integrates language development with civics education. The core curriculum focuses on language development and knowledge of workforce readiness competencies. Through a variety of projects and learning experiences, such as mock voter registrations and elections, and assemblies with national, state and local elected officials and other policymakers, students are encouraged to understand the role and workings of government and the importance of their citizen participation.students received english language class instruction, and civics education workshops were offered to the entire student body. Students participated in citizenship classes and passed their citizenship exam. Dorcas place provides these students case management support, and complete mock interviews with students prior to their interviews. The curriculum reviews 100 questions, and reviews u.s. History in preparation for the interview and test.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 83% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.