Doing Good Together

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200321382
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Wayzata, MN, USA
Phone
5702699688
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,851
Expenses
$167,020
Assets
$137,668
Liabilities
$63,692

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MIALISA MILLARES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • REBECCA NAHVI (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ASHLEY BRIZZO (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ROY GINSBURG (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Doing good together (dgt) encourages families to raise generous, thoughtful, civic-minded children by offering opportunities for them to practice kindness and serve others together. By working one-on-one with families, schools, parent groups, nonprofit agencies, faith groups and businesses, dgt strives to build a culture in which children grow up aware of social issues and poised to contribute throughout their lives.

What it reported doing in 2023

Doing good together seeks to engage families in an array of valuable service projects that are truly needed by nonprofits in the community. We do this by partnering with schools, faith communities and community organizations to create family-focused service events. These family service fairs provide opportunities for intergenerational engagement and meaningful, reflective and purposeful family fun that makes a difference in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $142K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.