Dog Tag Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452130904
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025279388
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Vocational Rehabilitation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,412,433
- Expenses
- $2,872,965
- Assets
- $3,072,757
- Liabilities
- $413,726
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MEGHAN OGILVIE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- MEGHAN OGILVIE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $132,155 total reported compensation
- MAUREEN DEVINE-AHL (DIR. OF PROGRAMS & COMMUNITY IMPACT): $106,722 total reported compensation
- DANIELLE VERBIEST (COO (FROM 7/31/24)): $47,249 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dog tag inc.'s (dt) mission is to empower veterans with service-connected disabilities, spouses and caregivers to find renewed purpose and community after serving our nation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fellowship program: dog tag's fellowship program acts as a catalyst for building resilience, finding renewed purpose, and forging a community for veterans with service-connected disabilities, military spouses and caregivers. The fellowship program is based on a comprehensive professional and personal development curriculum designed to prepare military veterans with service-connected disabilities, military spouses, and caregivers, to find success as they transition into the civilian workforce. This five-month program translates participants' military experience into workplace skills through the following five programming components: (1) continuing education: fellows earn a certificate in business administration and business acumen respectively through georgetown university's school of continuing studies; (2) hands-on learning: leveraging our bakery as a living business school, fellows rotate through each of our business functions, completing case studies and projects that support dog tag's everyday operations; (3) entrepreneurial training: fellows complete a capstone course where they each develop a business idea, culminating in the creation of a business plan, two-year budget, and business pitch to a panel of professional partners; (4) network and community building: partners, experts, and alumni are invited in to deliver learning lab style content, helping fellows expand their knowledge and connections; (5) wellness: fellows complete weekly wellness activities to support self-discovery, learning, development, and overall wellbeing. Activities include weekly reflection, journaling, meditation, and movement, in addition to our finding your voice program, where fellows learn storytelling and public speaking, and present a personal story in front of an audience at the end of the program. Dog tag fellowship programming is delivered in a hybrid format, enabling military-connected individuals nationwide to participate. Fellows participate in a combination of online learning, and in-person learning in Washington, dc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.2%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.2% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $132K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.