Dog Tag Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452130904
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2025279388
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Vocational Rehabilitation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,412,433
Expenses
$2,872,965
Assets
$3,072,757
Liabilities
$413,726

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEGHAN OGILVIE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • MEGHAN OGILVIE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $132,155 total reported compensation
  • MAUREEN DEVINE-AHL (DIR. OF PROGRAMS & COMMUNITY IMPACT): $106,722 total reported compensation
  • DANIELLE VERBIEST (COO (FROM 7/31/24)): $47,249 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dog tag inc.'s (dt) mission is to empower veterans with service-connected disabilities, spouses and caregivers to find renewed purpose and community after serving our nation.

What it reported doing in 2024

Fellowship program: dog tag's fellowship program acts as a catalyst for building resilience, finding renewed purpose, and forging a community for veterans with service-connected disabilities, military spouses and caregivers. The fellowship program is based on a comprehensive professional and personal development curriculum designed to prepare military veterans with service-connected disabilities, military spouses, and caregivers, to find success as they transition into the civilian workforce. This five-month program translates participants' military experience into workplace skills through the following five programming components: (1) continuing education: fellows earn a certificate in business administration and business acumen respectively through georgetown university's school of continuing studies; (2) hands-on learning: leveraging our bakery as a living business school, fellows rotate through each of our business functions, completing case studies and projects that support dog tag's everyday operations; (3) entrepreneurial training: fellows complete a capstone course where they each develop a business idea, culminating in the creation of a business plan, two-year budget, and business pitch to a panel of professional partners; (4) network and community building: partners, experts, and alumni are invited in to deliver learning lab style content, helping fellows expand their knowledge and connections; (5) wellness: fellows complete weekly wellness activities to support self-discovery, learning, development, and overall wellbeing. Activities include weekly reflection, journaling, meditation, and movement, in addition to our finding your voice program, where fellows learn storytelling and public speaking, and present a personal story in front of an audience at the end of the program. Dog tag fellowship programming is delivered in a hybrid format, enabling military-connected individuals nationwide to participate. Fellows participate in a combination of online learning, and in-person learning in Washington, dc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.2%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.2% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $132K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.