Dobama Theatre Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
340943782
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cleveland Heights, OH, USA
Phone
2169326838
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Theater

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,214,337
Expenses
$1,050,398
Assets
$807,795
Liabilities
$220,799

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RACHEL ZAKE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • NATHAN MOTTA (ARTISTIC DIR): $65,426 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dobama theatre, inc. Is dedicated to premiering important new plays by established & emerging playwrights in professional productions of the highest quality. Through theatrical production, community engagement, and education programming, dobama nurtures the development of theatre artists and builds new audiences for the arts while provoking an examination of our contemporary world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education programs: the marilyn bianchi kids playwriting festival (mbkpf), the dobama emerging actors program (deap), and the intern program (part iii, 4b) as the oldest youth playwriting festival in the country, the mbkpf exemplifies all aspects of dobamas mission: it encourages the creation of new plays, cultivates young audiences for the arts, and asks students to examine the world around them. Northeast Ohio students in grades 1-12 are invited to submit original plays to dobama for evaluation and feedback. The mbkpf culminates in an annual, fully-produced festival on dobamas stage of outstanding student plays as a community celebration of students work and creativity year-round. This is the core of dobamas educational programming and has been a staple in cleveland for more than 40 years. In-school literacy workshops are offered at no cost to public schools and provide educators with the tools to incorporate the program into their curriculum. Deap is an auditioned acting intensive hosted by dobama each summer where high school- and college-age students learn essential acting techniques from area professionals. Summer interns receive training in the areas of design, directing, and stage management. At the end of the program, students perform a fully designed, directed workshop production of a heightened-text play in order to apply what they have learned. The program prepares students for college auditions and future employment in the professional theatre world while honing communication and social-emotional skills. Tuition is on a sliding scale, and no student is turned away due to inability to pay. This program allows dobama to identify emerging talents and connect them with an opportunity to advance their craft in an environment that prizes diversity, experimentation, and excellence. The intern program admits groups of students for either a full mainstage season (september may) or a summer (may september). Interns receive close mentorship from administrative, artistic, technical, and support staff to provide a rounded education of the industry. The goal of the intern program is to provide opportunity for emerging professionals and to create a robust community of theatre professionals in the cleveland area. All interns have the opportunity to work in official positions on dobama productions, and all interns are paid for their work.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.4%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 57
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.4% of revenue deployed · 56.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $598K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.