Do Unto Others Assistance Dogs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991348098
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Lake Mary, FL, USA
Phone
4072127692
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Reported finances

Revenue
$47,306
Expenses
$31,698
Assets
$31,112
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA BARNETT (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF D)
  • WENDY HARTMAN (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF P)

People named in this filing

  • LAURA BARNETT (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF D)
  • WENDY HARTMAN (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF P)
  • SUSAN NAPIER (DIRECTOR OF CLIENT SUPPORT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Supported with disabilities whose lives will be transformed by supported independence. Our dogs will serve clients throughout Florida with a variety of disabilities such as, but not limited to, mobility, ptsd, and autism.

What it reported doing in 2025

Raising and training service dogs to empower independence for individuals in Florida with disabilities is the mission of do unto others assistance dogs.there are four ways that mission may be accomplished:1. Do unto others (d.u.o.) pups - our dedicated volunteer puppy raisers raise, train, and love a dog for someone they've never met from the time the puppy is 8 weeks old until they are fully trained at about 2 years of age. Clients receive a dog provided by do unto others, after an application and interview process 2. D.u.o. Prime - clients select their own with support and guidance from our do unto others team. The dog is purchased, and supported financially by the client; while do unto others volunteers provide the raising and training of the dog. 3. D.u.o. Hybrid - another opportunity to choose your own dog, but this option allows a client (who is able and willing) to participate in the raising and training of their own future service dog. These dogs move between the owner and volunteers on a mutually agreed upon schedule throughout the training period. 4. D.u.o. Supported - also often referred to as owner / trainer teams, these dogs are raised by their owner and do unto others will provide supervised public access exposures to help prepare them to be a successful service dog team. Our 2025 accomplishments include:1. Placement / graduation of three (3) teams; one prime dog for mobility; two owner trainer teams - one mobility / autism; one mobility.2. Acquisition through purchase, donation and/or training of twenty-two (22) dogs; a. Prime - four (4)b. Program - nine (9)c. Supported - eight (8)d. Hybrid - one (1)3. Certification of one (1) trainer with council of certified professional dog trainers - knowledge assessed (ccpdt - ka)

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 88.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.