Do Good Daniels Family Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
854077078
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
San Pedro, CA, USA
Phone
3109087898
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$603,852
Expenses
$718,093
Assets
$118,151
Liabilities
$123,687

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christi Daniels (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Robert Daniels (Executive Dir.): $37,875 total reported compensation
  • Christi Daniels (CEO): $30,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Empowering youth and their families to #DOGOOD by providing them with targeted care management services, housing support, mentorship, and life skills education giving them the tools to unleash their full potential and thrive.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Do Good Daniels Family Foundation is an Uncompromising Force for Good throughout communities by building healthy families through safe housing, transformative wrap-around services, family bonding activities and family focused workshops. Who We Serve: Families with Children, Children in Young families, Domestic Violence Victims with Children, Homeless Families, Underserved Families and Transitional Aged Youth. Where We Serve: Our GOOD has no boundaries, but we currently serve Los Angeles County. Our corporate office is in San Pedro, CA, our family shelter is in South Los Angeles (SPA 6) and our IABTC program is in several LAUSD schools throughout LAUSD. Our Programing Safe Housing (House of Do Good), Youth Mentorship (Do Good Bros), Community Giving (Serving Underserved Communities), LAUSD Student Programming (I Am Breaking the Chains- IABTC).

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 62% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 46
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.7%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.05; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 51.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 44.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.7% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 0 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $523K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.