Do-all Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
382024600
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Essexville, MI, USA
Phone
9898942851
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Sheltered Employment

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,234,442
Expenses
$2,198,681
Assets
$804,323
Liabilities
$365,755

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EMILIA GUTIERREZ (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • EMILIA GUTIERREZ (PRESIDENT/CEO): $98,234 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To assist individuals with varying disabilities achieve self-sufficiency through leadership, empowerment, material supports and employment training.

What it reported doing in 2024

Programs contracted by avcmh with do-all consist of employment services and cls/skill building. Employment service clients are provided with assistance to find and keep jobs in which they will succeed and be happy doing so. These jobs will be in an integrated setting that offers competitive wages in the job field of their choice. Through a variety of supports, staff will meet with individuals to create plans, set goals and provide them with the necessary tools and support to obtain and maintain employment within their community. Skill building services include time-limited training to help clients prepare for the workplace. We have a wide variety of supported volunteer experiences that provide a great chance to learn about workplace behavior, communication skills, and working as part of a team.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $98K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.