Djr Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721471263
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New Orleans, LA, USA
- Phone
- 5045984663
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,660
- Expenses
- $104,907
- Assets
- $3,029,928
- Liabilities
- $3,798
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREW KOPPLIN (DIRECTOR): $464,329 total reported compensation
- KELLIE CHAVEZ-GREENE (DIRECTOR): $231,635 total reported compensation
- KENNETH ST CHARLES (DIRECTOR (THROUGH 1/2/2024)): $22,129 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The foundation was organized specifically for the benefit of the greater new orleans foundation, a non profit organization exempt under 501(c)3.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 57.2%; rating input score 57
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 28.88; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.9% of revenue deployed · 57.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $464K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.