Division Ii Athletics Directors Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341874834
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Westlake, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4408924000
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $172,854
- Expenses
- $137,447
- Assets
- $421,482
- Liabilities
- $4,293
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRACI MURPHY (PRESIDENT)
- JENN BELL (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT/TREAS)
- CLYDE DOUGHTY JR (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT/SECR)
- LISA GODDARD MCGUIRK (THIRD VICE PRESIDENT)
- PATRICK A MANAK (CEO)
People named in this filing
- TRACI MURPHY (PRESIDENT)
- JENN BELL (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT/TREAS)
- CLYDE DOUGHTY JR (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT/SECR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The division ii athletics directors association's purpose is to empower its membership in their roles as directors of athletics. The objectives of the div ii - ada are to provide a collective voice for division ii athletics directors, provide a forum to discuss issues that impact the role of the directors, provide a recognized relationship with other athletic director associations and ncaa leadership groups, and to provide helpful information to its membership. In 2025 the division ii - ada had 280 dues paying members.
What it reported doing in 2025
In june 2025, division ii - ada held meetings to discuss issues that impact the role of athletic directors at division ii colleges and universities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.5%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.07; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.