Divine Dignity Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921093642
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6145419003
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Emergency Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $205,579
- Expenses
- $130,239
- Assets
- $145,495
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NANCY GILLETTE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARTY IGEL (BOARD MEMBER)
- ALICIA OVERMYER (BOARD MEMBER)
- ELAINE PIERCE (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Offering dignity and hope through hygiene products and sharing god's love.
What it reported doing in 2025
Divine dignity is a nonprofit touching lives by offering dignity and hope through distributing free hygiene products and sharing god's love and hope. Hygiene is often a largely unmet need in low-income communities. Many organizations provide food, shelter, and clothing to those in need, but hygiene is not one of the recognized needs. We distributed more than 10,000 bags of hygiene products with an estimated value of 30 each to low-income people and families throughout the columbus area. This year, we have a total of six hygiene centers, and we added new partners to increase our total to twenty hygiene closets located in secure city community centers, free medical clinics, recovery programs, schools, and churches to distribute essential hygiene products and fliers about divine dignity and our message of sharing god's love. Our products come through in-kind and monetary donations made by our supporters. We have a hygiene collection program that places signs and bins in local area churches, salons, and other businesses to collect donations. This effort is supported by approximately 6,000 hours donated by our 80 volunteers, staff, and directors. A portion of our outreach is to the teen community. The digniteens program provides an opportunity for local teens from churches and service organizations to help provide personal care hygiene items to low-income teens. The dignity 4 kids program works with local schools to make hygiene products available to school-aged children who lack this necessity, thereby removing this potential barrier to attendance. We have also increased our outreach to veterans' programs and homeless shelters.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.9%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 88.2%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.6%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.9% of revenue deployed · 88.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.