Diversity Uplifts Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833215066
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
Phone
6265026717
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Counseling, Support Groups

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,885,747
Expenses
$1,445,657
Assets
$321,755
Liabilities
$80,664

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • TAMIKKA CLAYBROOK (TREASURER): $89,958 total reported compensation
  • DR SAYIDA PEPRAH WILSON (BOARD CHAIR): $46,042 total reported compensation
  • SUSAN LOWE (SECRETARY): $9,333 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nbsp; organization apos; s nbsp; primary nbsp; purpose nbsp; is nbsp; to nbsp; improve nbsp; the nbsp; well-being nbsp; of nbsp; women nbsp; birthing nbsp; people nbsp; children nbsp; and nbsp; families nbsp; diversity nbsp; uplifts nbsp; aims nbsp; to nbsp; achieve nbsp; this nbsp; by nbsp; providing nbsp; trainings nbsp; and nbsp; solutions nbsp; to nbsp; increase nbsp; competence nbsp; and nbsp; cultural nbsp; humility nbsp; among nbsp; providers nbsp; and nbsp; systems nbsp; that nbsp; serve nbsp; these nbsp; communities

What it reported doing in 2023

The grant supports the implementation of the dhcs medi-cal doula benefit. Key deliverables developing a resource hub. Website for doulas advocating for doula and family interests in dhcs meetings and providing compen to community advisory members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 37
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.6%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 98.6%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: $191.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.3%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.1%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 85.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.6% of revenue deployed · 98.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $486K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 3 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $397K reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.