District Vi Association of Neonatologists Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
275562458
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Overland Park, KS, USA
Phone
9134991327
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,503
Expenses
$49,279
Assets
$207,117
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jessica White (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jessica White (President)
  • Sachin Amin (Secretary)
  • Samuel Wong (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of District VI Assoc. of Neonatologists is to educate healthcare specialists who take care of babies in the neonatal ICU. We provide clinical expertise with recognized experts in the practice of Neonatology. We expand the boundaries of learning to elevate the standards of quality for neonatal services in the communities and academic centers. Our group brings focuses on neonatal professionals from IL, IA, KS, MN, MO, WI and SD.

What it reported doing in 2025

Organization delivered the live activity: "18th Annual District VI Neonatology Meeting: Controversies in Neonatal Clinical Care" on September 4-5, 2025. It provided up to 11.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits for attendees. We had 14 experts in various aspects of neonatology present talks during the conference for over 150 attendees. A tuition fee was charged and honoraria were given to speakers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.1%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.2; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.