District Medical Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208106540
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6024705000
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$261,124,428
Expenses
$258,044,990
Assets
$117,325,475
Liabilities
$53,713,718

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PHYLLIS BIEDESS (COMMUNITY BOARD MEMBER, VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DR KOTE CHUNDU (BD. MEMBER, PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DR IMAN FEIZ-ERFAN (DIRECTOR OF NEUROSURGERY): $1,662,868 total reported compensation
  • DR KOTE CHUNDU (BD. MEMBER, PRESIDENT & CEO): $1,526,550 total reported compensation
  • DR MICHAEL SOCHACKI (ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON): $869,197 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are dedicated to improving the health and wellbeing of individuals in Arizona through an integrated medical group practice based on a balanced program of patient care, education, research, and community service. Our Vision District Medical Group (DMG) physicians will be recognized as leaders in providing high quality, innovative medical care delivered in a compassionate, respectful and responsive way. We will be a trusted partner in training the future healthcare providers in Arizona. We will create an environment to attract and support highly talented compassionate providers.

What it reported doing in 2024

Established in 1993, by 2010 our 350+ provider multi-specialty group practice evolved into district medical group, inc. (dmg), a physician-centric, physician-led, not-for-profit healthcare organization, and one of the largest medical practices in the phoenix area. Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of individuals in phoenix and the surrounding areas through this integrated group practice, focusing on patient care, education, research, and community service. We strive to ensure that our patients have equal access to the highest quality, safest care in the most appropriate settings, regardless of a patient's ability to pay. We seek to create and support new programs and services that reflect the needs of all patients, across all spectrums of life- from birth to the elderly, including the most vulnerable, the poor and the underserved. The heart of our mission is providing exceptional and compassionate medical care with no restrictions to our entire community. Dmg with its affiliates comprise 60 clinical sites, more than 500 physicians, 200 non-physician providers, and over 70 ancillary clinic staff. In 2024 dmg served patient volumes as follows: more than 21,000 as inpatient, over 480,000 as outpatient, and more than 113,000 emergency visits. During 2024 dmg's direct economic output, including the service economy, is estimated in excess of $200 million. The indirect economic benefit to the community is significantly more.district medical group staffs the valleywise health system, which includes a 233 bed acute care hospital, three inpatient psychiatric hospitals totaling 412 beds, two emergency departments, nine family health centers throughout the valley and two large diagnostic centers. Dmg also staffs the internationally renowned Arizona burn center, the 2nd largest in the us, admitting over 1,300 patients per year and serving almost 12,000 patients per year in an outpatient setting; the verified american college of surgeons level i trauma center, and level 2 pediatric trauma center; and the Arizona children's center, a nachri-certified children's hospital, caring for children through the pediatric emergency department, pediatric intensive care unit, the neonatal intensive care unit, and the pediatric inpatient areas, with a dedicated area for pediatric procedural sedations. Among other innovative programs that dmg provides is the refugee women's health clinic, the first of its kind in Arizona, providing culturally grounded healthcare to the growing refugee and immigrant community. Through affiliation with valleywise health system, the university of Arizona - college of medicine phoenix, and the creighton university Arizona health education alliance, we are a recognized leader in providing high quality, innovative medical care delivered in a fiscally responsible and cost-effective manner. As the largest teaching faculty in phoenix, we annually train over 300 residents and fellows, another 60 in affiliated programs, and supervise close to 500 medical student rotations. A large number of dmg physicians hold faculty positions with the university of Arizona - college of medicine phoenix and/or creighton university, participating in clinical lectures and other academic events, and actively teaching and supporting scholarly and research activities. In recent years we have been involved in a significant number of active research projects, including industry-sponsored and nih grants. Examples of our involvement include: development of a heat-illness registry at a safety-net hospital in phoenix, Arizona.diabetes education and empowerment project combined with a food program to improve health outcomes.measuring immunity against circulating influenza viruses: randomized immunogenicity study among us adults aged 18 - 64 years comparing two approved influenza vaccines.ambient whole blood analysis and research evaluation study (ambient).maternal health-seeking behaviors and maternal health experiences of african refugee wom

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.2%; rating input score 99; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 55.6%; rating input score 56; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $235.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.7M · 23 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.7M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 26 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.