District Attorneys Community Assistance Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475369021
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Lake Charles, LA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$731
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MIKE TERRANOVA (President)

People named in this filing

  • MIKE TERRANOVA (President)
  • MIKE DEMARIE (Director)
  • DUSTAN ABSHIRE (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

-To work with national, state and local religious and charitable organizations to provide charitable, educational, religious, literary, and scientific assistance to those in need in Calcasieu Parish.-To collect funds and donations for those in need throughout the community, including but not limited to crime victims, for charitable purposes for assistance with financial burdens and requests and material needs that they cannot meet without assistance, including but not limited to clothing, medication, food, shelter and transportation.-To further all charitable work, including working with the needy persons and families, along with those organizations that assist such individuals.

What it reported doing in 2023

Assisted organizations and individuals with financial burdens and requests for material needs that they cannot meet without assistance, including but not limited to clothing, medication, food, shelter and transportation.Assisted organizations to further all charitable work, including working with the needy persons and families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -41.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -45.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.