Dispatch For Good
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881798644
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Nonprofit Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $75,000
- Expenses
- $2,573
- Assets
- $75,597
- Liabilities
- $3,170
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Alex Fang (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Alex Fang (Executive Director)
- Alec Wright (Chairman)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This corporation is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for charitable purposes. The purpose of this corporation is to provide support social-impact companies grow and advance their missions. Dispatch for Good will provide support for promising social impact startups that have the potential to address social or environmental issues. These activities will include training boot camps mentorship or helping to create ways for philanthropic capital to support these causes via mechanisms such as foundations and Donor Advised Funds. In the context of these general purposes this shall be accomplished through but shall not be limited to outreach education startup acceleration commercialization support and fundraising.
What it reported doing in 2024
We have run a startup training program in partnership with Lawrence Berkeley Lab. The program helped scientists who are seeking to take promising technologies and advance them from the lab and into the market. The program consisted of training mentorship and peer training. The program was run by volunteers and incurred no expense and generated no revenue.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 96.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 29.38; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.