Discovering Options
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721552730
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3147218116
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,909
- Expenses
- $19,076
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARMAINE SMITH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ELAINE QUEATHEM (DIRECTOR)
- KEITH PRICE (DIRECTOR)
- JIM GOODWIN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Discovering options helped at-risk children avoid drug use and other self-destructive behaviors through mentoring and comprehensive after school programming that encourages family involvement.
What it reported doing in 2014
Since the inception of prep in 2001, discovering options delivered after school programs to over 1000 at-risk children that attend saint louis city schools. In order to address the lack of high quality and evidence based after school programming for st. Louis' most academically and socially impoverished children, discovering options developed an enriching after school program we called prep.the promoting responsibility through education prevention (prep) program was an after-school substance abuse and violence prevention program targeted at 4th and 5th grade high-risk youth who are predominantly african-american. The program included hands-on cultural cooking classes, yoga, art, social skills training, substance abuse prevention classes, conflict resolution sessions, behavior management and one-on-one therapeutic support. Change in social skills, an important protective factor for reducing substance abuse and violence, was assessed for 10-week prep sessions. There was a statistically significant improvement in child social skills for those attending the ten week sessions. These findings suggest that prep may help to fill the gap in evidence-based after-school program options for at-risk african american elementary school children. Prep was the cornerstone of discovering options after school programming. For many years, discovering options delivered enriching after-school and mentoring programs to fourth and fifth grade children (elementary prep) with one or more social, academic or familial risk factors for substance abuse. Each year we have delivered highly structured after school programs to at-risk youth. Elementary prep was an evaluated, award winning, substance abuse prevention after-school and mentoring program targeted to 4th and 5th graders with multiple risk factors attending st. Louis public, or charter schools. When fully funded, there were four elementary prep sessions each year with each session lasting ten weeks. Services included clusters of three after school sessions, twice a quarter, with five family dinner nights. Discovering options staff conducted home visits and worked with parents, but in paricular, mothers on coping, stress reduction, yoga and games to play with their children. When fully funded, prep ran monday through thursday, from 3:15 - 6:00 p.m. The after-school program was led by the prevention services coordinator who holds a master's degree in social work. Children were picked up from their school by first student transportation and transported to the first unitarian church at 5007 waterman. Children were transported to their homes after each class.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.1%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 40.7%; rating input score 41
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -74.9%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -125.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -51.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -49% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.1% of revenue deployed · 40.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.