Disabled American Veterans Department of Montana

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810245122
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Helena, MT, USA
Phone
4066002254
Rating
54
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$185,180
Expenses
$168,829
Assets
$63,243
Liabilities
$37

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN GRANTIER (COMMANDER)
  • CHASE NATALIE (ADJUTANT/TREASU)
  • ISAAC SATO (SR V CMMDR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The dav manages a volunteer transportation network, which is responsible for transporting veterans to and from their va scheduled appointments. This also includes scheduled appointments for all homeless veterans and veterans that are students that need rides to a scheduled va appointment. The funds for the vans are all raised by donations. Then when purchased, they are turned over to the va who maintains them and pays for all fuel. In return, the va allows the dav to manage the dav volunteer trasnportation network with our entire volunteer staff and our two paid hospital service coordinators (hscs) each of which manages ten local area coordinators (lacs) and close to 250 voluneteer drivers in different areas throughout Montana. The dav is helping all veterans and continues to grow.the dav donates funds to other organizations that also support the needs of veterans such as the state veterans homes in columbia falls and glendive, the state cemeteries and some others that are sometimes ne

What it reported doing in 2024

Volunteer transportation network

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 23
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.3%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 24.5%; rating input score 24

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.3% of revenue deployed · 24.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.