Disability Chamber of Commerce Rio Grande Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843871673
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Pharr, TX, USA
Phone
9565020055
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,718
Expenses
$46,172
Assets
$25,232
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EVELYN CANO (PRESIDENT)
  • ESMERALDA LEAL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • EMILIA TREVINO (BOARD MEMBER)
  • VANESSA M VERA MS (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ADRIANA RODRIGUEZ (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of dcc-rgv is to support local businesses via the promotion of inclusive hiring best practices, fostering collaboration, and promoting economic growth for the cross-disability community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our training programs have significantly increased awareness and understanding of disability-related issues among businesses in the rgv. Businesses improve in customer service, compliance with ada regulations, and increased hires. Companies have reported enhanced productivity, reduced turnover rates, and improved employee satisfaction. They gained access to a diverse talent pool. We have received accolades from both business leaders and member of the disability community for our commitment to driving positive change. Our efforts have garnered attention and support from various stakeholders, including government agencies, media, and corporate partners.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -38.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 116.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.