Dir Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821875810
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Phone
3179001920
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Expenses
$14,903
Assets
$15,648

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATTHEW DANSKIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TROY CLYMER (TREASUER)
  • BILL COMBES (DIRECTOR)
  • MATTHEW DANSKIN (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Form an alliance of the best of breed vendors who truly serve the contractor for the greater good of their industries and inherently the consumer. By forming this alliance we all grow businesses the right way benefiting a community of contractors who, with the help of dir vendors, change the perception of consumers in a positive way for the industry as a whole. Together we will work to provide the best live and online educational opportunities and create an ecosystem where the industry will decide who the best resources are.

What it reported doing in 2024

Form an alliance of the best of breed vendors who truly serve the contractor for the greater good of their industries and inherently the consumer. By forming this alliance we all grow businesses the right way benefiting a community of contractors who, with help of the dir vendors, change the perception of consumers in a positive way for the industry as a whole. Together we will work to provide the best live and online educational opportunities and create and ecosystem where the industry will decide who the best resources are.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.