Dinosaur Land Llc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862002717
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Fort Worth, TX, USA
Phone
8177663962
Rating
54
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural History, Natural Science Museums
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$90,108
Expenses
$98,794
Assets
$189,363
Liabilities
$100,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sarah Martinez Cantu (President)

People named in this filing

  • Sarah Martinez Cantu (President)
  • Sarah Martinez (Secretary)
  • Richard Cantu (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Dinosaur Land is a Children's Museum that has static dinosaur sculptures as well as animatronic life like dinosaur replicas, with a main focus on educating the community about the history of Dinosaurs. Dinosaur Land also now has a Princess Land section that teaches the history of real Queens, Empresses, and Princesses that existed in history their life stories and accomplishments. Dinosaur Land has hands on learning centers throughout the park including dinosaur fossil sand pit, build construction blocks, and other constructive learning available for patriots. Dinosaur Land also has a live stock animals on site chickens, Rabbits, alpacas, and goats with education provided about the animals origins, needs, and history.

What it reported doing in 2025

Dinosaurs Sculptures Purchased and put on display, no grants

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 32
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.3%; rating input score 33
  • Program expense ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 30

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 174.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.3% of revenue deployed · 30.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.