University of Maryland Capital Region Health
Legal name: Dimensions Health Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521289729
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Upper Marlboro, MD, USA
- Phone
- 240-677-1000
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $522,450,363
- Expenses
- $525,733,525
- Assets
- $760,016,187
- Liabilities
- $414,917,997
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NATHANIEL RICHARDSON Jr (President and CEO, UM CRH)
- MOHAN SUNTHA MD (President and CEO, UMMS)
Highest reported compensation
- MOHAN SUNTHA MD (President and CEO, UMMS): $3,940,617 total reported compensation
- ANDREW POLLAK MD (Director): $1,681,723 total reported compensation
- JOSEPH E HOFFMAN III (Director): $1,439,816 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At University of Maryland Medical System, our values are the building blocks of the shared culture and common understanding that guide us in fulfilling our mission and vision as we provide Marylanders a better state of care. Learn more:** Mission | Vision | Values UM Capital Region Medical Center Has Been Named a High Performing Hospital 2025-2026 in Six Conditions and Procedures by _U.S. News & World Report_. Our Values compassion, discovery, excellence, diversity and integrity Mission, Vision and Values At University of Maryland Medical System, our values are the building blocks of the shared culture and common understanding that guide us in fulfilling our...
What it reported doing in 2024
The main function of the organization is to provide community benefits through programs and activities that improve access to health care and improve the overall health of the communities we serve. Our stated mission is to enhance the health and wellnes of our patients and communities, providing state of the art clinical care and community leadership with compassion, dignity and respect.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 73.7%; rating input score 74; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 87.3% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $456M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.9M · 30 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $25.1M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 58 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.