Dillman's Creative Arts Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391663352
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Lac Du Flambeau, WI, USA
Phone
7155883143
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$173,191
Expenses
$128,284
Assets
$99,906
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENNIS K ROBERTSON (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • SUE D ROBERTSON (VICE PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DENNIS K ROBERTSON (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • SARA MUENDER (DIRECTOR)
  • SHARON REILLY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To conduct educational workshops in art, photography, personal growth, and theater productions.

What it reported doing in 2020

Classes are offered for a variety of arts, i.e. Watercolor, native american arts & crafts, photography, etc. Well-known prof. Instruct and teach classes. Approx 275 individuals attend

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.9%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65% of revenue deployed · 87.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.