Digitunity Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863935645
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
North Conway, NH, USA
Phone
2038639100
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,580,793
Expenses
$2,107,747
Assets
$2,099,849
Liabilities
$37,847

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEREMY W HEGLE (PRESIDENT)
  • ALLISON STROBEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SCOT HENLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • SCOT HENLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $229,201 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN BARRETT (DIRECTOR OF IT AND COMMUNI): $201,458 total reported compensation
  • KARISA TASHJIAN (DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMS): $179,415 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To achieve its mission, digitunity commits its time, expertise, energy, and influence to 1. Cultivate a ready androbust supply of free or low cost computers to support digital inclusion; 2. Establish or bolster local systems ofdistribution; and 3. Develop and apply knowledge that leads to inclusive systems change.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, the organization worked to advance digital equity by sourcing and placing donations of computers and accessories with community-based organizations in its national practitioner network, advising states on strategies for meeting the technology needs of residents impacted by the digital divide, supporting the development of state digital equity plans required by the digital equity act, and leveraging its position of thought leadership to provide valuable resources, publications, and information to the digital inclusion field.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.2%; rating input score 36
  • Program expense ratio: 60.2%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: $957.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 41.1%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 37.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.2% of revenue deployed · 60.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $229K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.