Digital Promise

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465460594
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2024503675
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Promotion of International Understanding

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,817,083
Expenses
$69,038,579
Assets
$141,162,892
Liabilities
$98,606,582

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEAN-CLAUDE BRIZARD (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • JEREMY ROSCHELLE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KIMBERLY ANN SMITH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JEAN-CLAUDE BRIZARD (PRESIDENT & CEO): $459,274 total reported compensation
  • CHAULA GUPTA (VP & CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $315,875 total reported compensation
  • KATHRYN PETRILLO-SMITH (VP & COO): $301,314 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Digital Promise expands opportunity for learners of all ages by working across research, technology, and practice.

What it reported doing in 2024

Powerful learning: powerful learning is rooted in principles that empower both educators and learners, emphasizing collaboration, agency and the use of innovative tools and strategies to create impactful educational experiences. In 2024, the hp teaching fellows continued to advance powerful learning through regional and national conference presentations, leading discussions that enriched the learning community with insights and professional experiences. Through the ciena solutions challenge, digital promise and ciena awarded 20 project teams $2,500 to sustain and scale student-led projects. Students also shared their work with a global audience at the 2024 youthmade festival, digital promise's global celebration of youth creativity and innovation. The learner variability project (lvp) leverages emerging research to uncover strategies that meet the diverse needs of learners. In 2024, the lvp updated its learner variability navigator to with strategies aimed to be inclusive of students with learning differences. The pathways and credentials team advanced access to opportunity, rooted in the belief that pathways should open doors for all learners, by releasing influential research on learners and workers navigating technology careers, rural early childhood educators advancing socially and economically, learning and employment records (lers), and publishing its first ebook on micro-credentials for lifelong learning. The team also launched badge engine, digital promise's first open-source product.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 62
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $54.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 91.9%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.04; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 14 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 93% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $61.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $459K · 27 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $736K reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 89 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 56 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.