Digital Health for Equitable Health Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871850266
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2024695268
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$425,000
Expenses
$403,622
Assets
$29,074
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TANISHA HILL (PRESIDENT/DI)
  • MICHAEL CRAWFORD THROUGH 100623 (V PRESIDENT/)

People named in this filing

  • TANISHA HILL (PRESIDENT/DI)
  • MICHAEL CRAWFORD THROUGH 100623 (V PRESIDENT/)
  • DOLLY JUDGE THROUGH 92623 (TREASURER/DI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the common good and general welfare of the people of the community by transforming the future of healthcare through digital inclusion.

What it reported doing in 2023

Advocacy for the underserved - advocate for legislation and regulations that promote health equity and digital health. Dheh actively works with members of congress and their staff that are developing legislation to address health equity and digital health. Dheh members and advisors directly work with congressional offices on a variety of bills to, for example, expand telehealth services, promote the access to digital health products that can improve healthcare for underserved populations, and to improve the center for medicare and medicaid services (cms) ability to monitor how effectively its payment systems address health equity. In addition, dheh works with cms to advocate for medicare payment policies that support providing digital health services to underserved populations and to promote health equity. Dheh also frequently hosts discussions from policy makers to identify new ways to improve care for underserved populations rural and urban. These policies have the potential to impact tens of millions of patient lives, including patients receiving medicare.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 92.4%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 116.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.7% of revenue deployed · 92.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $373K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $385K reported
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.