Digital Fabrication Network Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300808092
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- American Canyon, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7075523500
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $48,760
- Expenses
- $25,061
- Assets
- $67,010
- Liabilities
- $4,396
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM KREYSER (CEO)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM KREYSER (CEO)
- CHRIS LUEBKEMAN (CHAIRMAN)
- GREG HOWES (VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ditigal fabrication network (dfn) is an international network that aims to promote information technology, research and innovation in manufacturing for its members and their customers. Dfn's network establishes an online and in-person community that is passionate about the digital fabrication world.
What it reported doing in 2016
Collected information relative to digital fabrication to share with members through the website, newsletter, social media and other tools; formed alliances with other organizations engaged in similar or related activities; formed working groups to explore opportunities for cross- industry collaboration; hosted a dfab net summit for key industry leaders and digital fabrication experts to discuss challenges and opportunities for better use and enhancement of digital fabrication tools and techniques; hosted digital fabrication hack days for innovative members to tackle data transfer, digital manufacturing, and software issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.67; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.