Dickinson Police Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363263571
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Dickinson, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7014567759
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Law Enforcement
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,188
- Expenses
- $102,972
- Assets
- $48,899
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNY BAGGATTA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JENNY BAGGATTA (PRESIDENT)
- TAYLOR PETERS (VICE PRESIDE)
- DILLON PRAUS (2ND PRESIDEN)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A.to bring together all employees qualified for membership under article ii of this constitution in an effort to promote the interchange of ideas and better the police department as a whole. B.to promote and protect the professional, personal and social welfare of the duly qualified members of the dickinson police department. C.to purchase or secure materials and equipment not otherwise furnished by the dickinson police department. D.to promote the dickinson police department in the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
To promote and protect the professional, personal and social welfare of the duly qualified members of the dickinson police department.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 97% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34.1%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 31.5%; rating input score 32
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.2%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34.1% of revenue deployed · 31.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $32K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.