Dickinson Hospitals Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 386093161
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Iron Mountain, MI, USA
- Phone
- 9067765790
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $382,540
- Expenses
- $110,034
- Assets
- $1,512,185
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE PONTBRIAND (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MIKE CAREY (DIRECTOR)
- TAMARA JUUL (SECRRETARY/E)
- TERRY LAVALLIE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To solicit, receive and expend funds to improve medical and hospital care facilities, services and programs at marshfield medical clinic-dickinson
What it reported doing in 2025
We supported our cancer program in our area. We paid to support heart health. We paid for gas cards for patients to travel for health care. We purchased patient chairs, paid for a grant for the sleep lab, bought an ob fetal monitor, paid for bladder scanners, mri ferro, supported our cardio partners and our concussion program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.9%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 71.2%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.74; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.9% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $102K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.